La necesidad de aplicación de la pena natural en los delitos culposos de tránsito cuando la víctima es el/la cónyuge y/o conviviente del infractor, en el ordenamiento jurídico ecuatoriano.
Fecha
2023-06
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Otavalo
Resumen
Dentro de esta investigación se estudia la institución de la pena natural, la cual es relativamente nueva dentro del ordenamiento jurídico, esto debido a que se la ha implementado recién desde agosto del 2014 con la vigencia del Código Orgánico Integral Penal. La razón de ser de esta institución de la pena natural es limitar el poder punitivo del estado, en virtud de la no necesidad de aplicación de una pena estatal (que no es lo mismo que castigo), a quien a causa y consecuencia de un delito culposo, ya ha tenido suficiente castigo por su mal causado. El objeto de estudio en este artículo, se enfoca directamente en la pena natural, la descrita en el art. 372 del COIP, y como el legislador ha excluido de esta figura jurídica al cónyuge, conviviente o pareja en unión de hecho por completo y las consecuencias de aquello. Se valora además si es necesario que se reforme el articulado del COIP, se explican los principios que rodean a la institución jurídica de la pena natural, se analizan los denominados casos trágicos, para así al final poder encontrar una solución jurídica, justa, proporcional y legítima al problema de investigación. El tipo de investigación se basa en un enfoque el cualitativo, con indagación de tipo documental, con un nivel explicativo, una técnica de estudio de casos, y como instrumento se utilizan entrevistas a operadores de justicia.
ABSTRACT: Within this investigation, the institution of natural punishment is studied, which is relatively new within the legal system, because it has only been implemented since August 2014 with the validity of the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code. The raison d'être of this institution of natural punishment is to limit the punitive power of the state, by virtue of the non-necessity of applying a state penalty (which is not the same as punishment), to those who cause and consequence of a crime Guilty, he has already had enough punishment for his wrong done. The object of study in this article focuses directly on natural punishment, the one described in art. 372 of the COIP, and how the legislator has completely excluded the spouse, cohabitant or partner in de facto union from this legal figure and the consequences of that. It is also evaluated whether it is necessary to reform the articles of the COIP, the principles that surround the legal institution of natural punishment are explained, the so-called tragic cases are analyzed, so that in the end we can find a legal, fair, proportional and legitimate to the research problem. The type of research is based on a qualitative approach, with documentary-type inquiry, with an explanatory level, a case study technique, and interviews with justice operators are used as an instrument.
ABSTRACT: Within this investigation, the institution of natural punishment is studied, which is relatively new within the legal system, because it has only been implemented since August 2014 with the validity of the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code. The raison d'être of this institution of natural punishment is to limit the punitive power of the state, by virtue of the non-necessity of applying a state penalty (which is not the same as punishment), to those who cause and consequence of a crime Guilty, he has already had enough punishment for his wrong done. The object of study in this article focuses directly on natural punishment, the one described in art. 372 of the COIP, and how the legislator has completely excluded the spouse, cohabitant or partner in de facto union from this legal figure and the consequences of that. It is also evaluated whether it is necessary to reform the articles of the COIP, the principles that surround the legal institution of natural punishment are explained, the so-called tragic cases are analyzed, so that in the end we can find a legal, fair, proportional and legitimate to the research problem. The type of research is based on a qualitative approach, with documentary-type inquiry, with an explanatory level, a case study technique, and interviews with justice operators are used as an instrument.
Descripción
Palabras clave
cónyuge, Derecho, Procedimiento legal, Igualdad de derechos
Citación
Tapia, E. X. (2023). La necesidad de aplicación de la pena natural en los delitos culposos de tránsito cuando la víctima es el/la cónyuge y/o conviviente del infractor, en el ordenamiento jurídico ecuatoriano. Maestría en Derecho procesal y litigación oral. Universidad de Otavalo